Transaction agreements
Credit agreement and indenture
status: draft
Credit agreement and indenture
The Credit Agreement (for warehouse facilities) or Indenture (for term securitizations) is the governing document. It establishes who owes what to whom, when payments happen, and what triggers default. Every other document in the stack references it.
status: draft
When each applies
| Structure | Governing Document | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Warehouse facility | Credit Agreement | Direct lending relationship; capital provider has direct workout rights |
| Private placement | Credit Agreement or Note Purchase Agreement | Similar to warehouse but may have lighter covenants |
| Term ABS (rated) | Indenture + Trust Agreement | Trustee sits between issuer and investors; actions require trustee direction |
| CLO | Indenture | Collateral manager has discretion within defined parameters |
The distinction matters for enforcement. Under a credit agreement, the lender can act directly. Under an indenture, the trustee must act, typically upon direction from a specified percentage of noteholders. This adds procedural steps but also provides protection since a single creditor cannot act unilaterally.
status: draft
Commitment and availability
The commitment section defines what you can actually borrow and when. This is where term sheet economics become operational reality.
Key provisions
| Provision | What It Governs | Negotiation Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum commitment | Total facility size | Higher is better; negotiate accordion option |
| Initial commitment | Starting amount before ramp | Align with realistic origination timeline |
| Availability period | How long you can draw | Minimum 18-24 months for new asset classes |
| Conditions precedent | Requirements for each draw | Minimize subjective conditions |
| Minimum draw size | Smallest permitted borrowing | Keep low ($500K-$1M) for operational flexibility |
| Draw frequency | How often you can borrow | Daily or weekly preferred |
What the term sheet does not tell you
A $100M commitment with a 60-day ramp period and 10 conditions to each draw is worth less than a $75M commitment available on 2 days’ notice. Evaluate:
Ramp requirements. Some facilities require you to fund 25% of commitment within 90 days or face commitment reduction. If your origination pipeline is lumpy, this creates pressure to fund suboptimal assets.
Conditions precedent to draws. Every draw typically requires:
- Updated borrowing base certificate showing availability
- No Default or Event of Default exists
- Representations remain true
- No Material Adverse Change
The last two are subjective. Push for specificity on what constitutes a rep breach or MAC that blocks draws.
Administrative burden. If each draw requires 5 days’ notice, trustee confirmation, and 15 pages of documentation, you lose flexibility. Negotiate for same-day or next-day draws with streamlined documentation.
Sample negotiation language
Subjective MAC blocking draws:
Problematic: “No Material Adverse Change shall have occurred since the Closing Date.”
Better: “No Material Adverse Change (as defined in Section X, limited to [specific objective triggers]) shall have occurred since the Closing Date.”
Silent commitment reduction:
Problematic: “If Borrower fails to fund at least $25,000,000 within 90 days of Closing, Commitment shall automatically reduce to the amount then outstanding.”
Better: “If Borrower fails to fund at least $25,000,000 within 90 days of Closing, Commitment may, upon 30 days’ written notice from Administrative Agent, be reduced to [X]; provided that Borrower may avoid such reduction by funding such shortfall within such notice period.”
status: draft
Interest and fees
Interest provisions seem straightforward until you read the calculation mechanics.
Standard provisions
| Component | Market Standard | Watch Out For |
|---|---|---|
| Base rate | SOFR (1M or 3M) | Legacy LIBOR fallback language |
| Credit spread | 200-500 bps depending on asset class | Spread step-ups buried in schedules |
| Default interest | +200-300 bps | Automatic vs. notice-triggered |
| Commitment fee | 25-50 bps on undrawn | Calculated on total vs. unfunded only |
| Unused fee | 0-25 bps additional | Duplicative with commitment fee |
| Exit fee | 0-100 bps | Applies to prepayment or only natural runoff |
Calculation conventions
Day count conventions affect your actual cost:
- Actual/360: Most common for credit agreements. You pay interest on actual days elapsed divided by 360. This means you pay approximately 1.4% more than quoted over a year.
- 30/360: Each month is 30 days, year is 360. More predictable but less common.
- Actual/365: Most accurate to calendar time. Common in UK documentation.
The difference between Actual/360 and Actual/365 on a $100M facility at SOFR + 300 bps is roughly $8,000-$10,000 annually.
Default interest negotiation
Default interest should only apply after notice and expiration of any cure period, not automatically upon a technical default.
Problematic language: “Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, all outstanding Obligations shall bear interest at the Default Rate.”
Better language: “Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an Event of Default, following written notice from Administrative Agent to Borrower specifying such Event of Default and the expiration of any applicable cure period, all outstanding Obligations shall bear interest at the Default Rate.”
status: draft
Events of default
This is where the document can hurt you most. A typical credit agreement has 15-25 events of default.
Standard events and negotiation points
| Event | Standard Protection | What to Negotiate |
|---|---|---|
| Payment default | 3-5 business day grace period | Expand to 5 days; exclude wire transfer delays |
| Financial covenant breach | 30-day cure period for most | Equity cure rights; rolling test periods |
| Performance trigger breach | Often no cure | Cure period of 30-60 days; notification instead of default |
| Rep breach | Material breach standard | Materiality qualifiers; knowledge qualifiers |
| Material adverse change | Subjective | Objective triggers only; require actual demonstrable impact |
| Cross-default | Acceleration of other debt | Threshold ($X or more); exclude certain debt |
| Change of control | 50% ownership change | Define control more specifically; carve out internal reorganizations |
| Servicer default | Linked to SSA | Independent definition concerns; cure alignment |
| Judgment | Any judgment | Threshold amount ($X or more); exclude insured claims |
| ERISA | Any liability | Threshold; covered by insurance |
| Regulatory | Loss of any license | Material licenses only; cure period |
Critical protection: notice and cure
Every event of default should require:
- Written notice specifying the default
- Reasonable cure period (minimum 30 days for non-payment defaults)
- Failure to cure before acceleration becomes effective
Silent acceleration is unacceptable. Language like “upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, all Obligations shall automatically become due and payable” means you can be in technical default without knowing it.
Required language: “Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an Event of Default, upon written notice from the Administrative Agent to the Borrower (which notice shall specify the Event of Default and, if applicable, any remaining cure period), the Commitments shall terminate and all Obligations shall become immediately due and payable.”
Material adverse change
MAC clauses are the most dangerous subjective trigger.
| MAC Language | Risk Level | Typical Usage |
|---|---|---|
| ”Any event that, in the lender’s sole judgment, constitutes a MAC” | Extreme | Never accept |
| ”Any event that, in the lender’s reasonable judgment, constitutes a MAC” | High | Push for objective standards |
| ”Any event that has resulted in a Material Adverse Effect as defined in Schedule X” | Moderate | Review Schedule X carefully |
| ”MAC limited to [specific events]“ | Lower | Preferred |
Negotiate for objective standards. Acceptable MAC triggers might include: bankruptcy of a key counterparty, loss of material licenses, violation of law resulting in material liability, or breach of financial covenants. Unacceptable: “decline in business prospects” or “adverse market conditions.”
status: draft
Amendment and waiver
Who can amend the documents and under what circumstances matters enormously when you need flexibility later.
Standard thresholds
| Amendment Type | Typical Threshold | Practical Reality |
|---|---|---|
| Administrative (dates, addresses, clerical) | Agent alone | Easy; usually 5-10 business days |
| Non-material | Majority lenders (50%+) | Achievable with good relationship |
| Material (advance rates, covenants, triggers) | Supermajority (66.67% or 75%) | Requires broad consensus; 2-4 weeks |
| Fundamental (commitment reduction, maturity extension, subordination) | Unanimous | Extremely difficult; one holdout blocks |
What to negotiate
Define “material” specifically. Vague definitions mean everything arguably requires supermajority consent. Push for a list of what constitutes material amendments.
Exclude certain amendments from unanimity. If you have a single difficult lender, unanimous consent requirements become a blocking right. Try to limit unanimity to true fundamentals: maturity extension affecting their piece, reduction of their commitment, subordination of their payment priority.
Negative consent for administrative changes. “Unless Administrative Agent receives objection within 10 business days, the following amendments shall be deemed approved” speeds up minor changes.
Snooze/lose provisions. Lenders who do not respond within X days are deemed to have consented (for non-fundamental amendments). This prevents minority blocking through inaction.
status: draft
Common pitfalls
Sole discretion on eligibility
If the capital provider has “sole discretion” to determine whether an asset is eligible, they can effectively shut down your facility by deeming new originations ineligible.
Problematic: “The Administrative Agent shall determine, in its sole discretion, whether any Asset satisfies the Eligibility Criteria.”
Better: “Eligibility shall be determined in accordance with the Eligibility Criteria set forth in Schedule X. The Administrative Agent shall not unreasonably withhold a determination that an Asset meeting such objective criteria is Eligible.”
Unilateral assignment
If the capital provider can assign its commitment to anyone without your consent, you may end up with a counterparty you don’t want to work with.
Standard market: Assignment to affiliates freely; assignment to others requires borrower consent, not to be unreasonably withheld. Some agreements add: “consent not required if Event of Default has occurred and is continuing.”
Conflicting defined terms
The credit agreement defines “Servicer Default” one way. The servicing agreement defines it differently. Which controls?
Fix before signing: Create a defined terms concordance. Wherever a term is defined in multiple documents, ensure consistency or specify which controls.
Hidden discretion
Search the document for “sole discretion,” “absolute discretion,” “in its judgment,” and “may determine.” Each instance is a potential area where the capital provider has unchecked authority. Push back on the most consequential ones.
status: draft
Review checklist
Before signing, verify:
- Grace periods exist for all Events of Default (minimum 3 business days for payment, 30 days for covenants)
- MAC clause has objective standards or specific triggers
- Draw conditions are achievable and not overly subjective
- Amendment thresholds are workable; material vs. non-material is defined
- No silent acceleration language
- Eligibility determinations have objective standards
- Cross-default has materiality threshold
- Assignment requires borrower consent
- Defined terms match across all transaction documents
- Financial covenant calculations work with your actual numbers