Playbooks
Accessing insurance capital for originators
Accessing insurance capital for originators
Insurance companies represent one of the largest pools of long-duration capital in the world. With over $8 trillion in general account assets seeking yield, insurers are natural partners for originators with stable, investment-grade-adjacent collateral. But accessing insurance capital requires understanding their unique constraints: duration matching, NAIC ratings, regulatory capital, and extended timelines.
This guide covers how insurers evaluate ABF opportunities, how to access them through direct relationships and insurance asset managers, and what structures work for their requirements.
Why insurance capital matters
The insurance capital opportunity
Insurance companies need yield on long-duration liabilities. Traditional fixed income doesn’t provide enough spread over their liability costs. ABF offers higher yields with structures that can achieve investment-grade ratings.
What insurers bring:
- Multi-year capital commitments (not annual renewals)
- Large check sizes ($50M-$500M per relationship)
- Patient capital with long investment horizons
- Competitive pricing for assets that fit (SOFR + 150-300 bps)
- Relationship stability (insurers don’t pull back like bank credit committees)
What insurers require:
- Investment-grade or near-investment-grade credit profile
- Duration matching to their liabilities (typically 3-10 years)
- NAIC-friendly structures
- Extensive reporting and credit monitoring
- Larger portfolio sizes (typically $100M+ to engage)
When insurance capital makes sense
Your assets have 3+ year duration. Insurance works best for auto loans, equipment finance, mortgages, and other longer-dated assets where the duration matches insurance liabilities. Short-duration revolving portfolios (credit cards, BNPL) are a harder fit.
Your collateral is investment-grade adjacent. Insurers prefer assets that would rate BBB/Baa or better. Deep subprime consumer lending typically doesn’t fit insurance mandates.
You have scale. Insurance relationships require $50M-$100M minimum portfolio size. The diligence investment doesn’t make sense for smaller deals.
You want multi-year commitments. Insurance facilities often come with 3-5 year commitments versus bank annual renewals. If capital stability matters, insurance is attractive.
You’re willing to invest in the relationship. Insurance capital takes 6-18 months to access the first time. Originators seeking quick capital should look elsewhere initially.
Accessing insurance capital
Path 1: Direct insurance relationships
Large insurers have investment teams that allocate directly to ABF. Building direct relationships is time-intensive but provides the most favorable economics.
Major insurers with direct ABF programs:
- MetLife
- Prudential
- New York Life
- TIAA-CREF
- Principal Financial
- Lincoln Financial
- Athene (Apollo-affiliated)
- Global Atlantic (KKR-affiliated)
How direct relationships work:
Insurance general accounts are managed by internal investment teams. These teams have private credit allocations that include ABF. To access them directly:
-
Identify the right team. Look for “Private Placements,” “Private Credit,” or “Alternative Fixed Income” within the insurance company’s investment arm.
-
Make the introduction. Warm introductions through existing relationships, placement agents, or investment bankers are essential. Cold outreach rarely works.
-
Present a portfolio opportunity. Insurers typically invest in rated notes from warehouses or term ABS, not in raw loan pools. Present a structure, not just a portfolio.
-
Survive diligence. Insurance diligence is extensive: 4-6 months of credit analysis, operational review, and legal structuring.
-
Execute documentation. Insurance investments require detailed documentation and ongoing reporting obligations.
Requirements for direct relationships:
- $100M+ portfolio (preferably $200M+)
- Management team with institutional track record
- Audited financials from a recognized firm
- Existing warehouse facility with a recognized counterparty
- Clear path to investment-grade ratings on structured notes
Path 2: Insurance asset managers
Insurance asset managers aggregate capital from multiple insurance companies and deploy it into ABF. They’re an easier path to insurance capital, though with a layer of economics between you and the ultimate source.
Major insurance asset managers:
- Barings (Mass Mutual affiliate)
- PGIM (Prudential’s asset manager)
- Voya Investment Management
- PineBridge Investments
- Conning & Company
- Nuveen (TIAA affiliate)
- New York Life Investments
What insurance asset managers offer:
- Access to multiple insurance company clients
- More flexibility than direct insurance (they have discretion)
- Faster decisions than engaging insurers directly
- Smaller minimum investment sizes ($25M-$50M)
- Expertise in ABF that direct insurance teams may lack
What they require:
- Near-investment-grade credit profile
- Duration matching to insurance liabilities
- NAIC-compliant structures
- Strong reporting and monitoring capabilities
How to approach them:
- Identify the private credit or ABF team within the asset manager
- Request introduction through shared relationships
- Present your portfolio and proposed structure
- Navigate their internal credit process (2-4 months typical)
- Close into their commingled vehicles or separately managed accounts
Path 3: Insurance-affiliated alternative managers
Several large alternative asset managers have affiliated insurance companies that provide captive capital for ABF.
Examples:
- Athene (Apollo Global Management)
- Global Atlantic (KKR)
- Fortitude (Carlyle)
- Everlake (formerly AIG Life & Retirement, now Blackstone-managed)
What this path offers:
- Integrated capital solution (warehouse + term + insurance takeout)
- Single relationship manager across structures
- Large capital pools with defined ABF allocations
- Potentially faster access than traditional insurers
What to understand:
- These platforms have return requirements beyond pure insurance yield
- They may take equity-like positions alongside credit
- The relationship is with the asset manager, who has insurance capital, not with the insurance company directly
- Terms may be more aggressive than traditional insurance (higher spreads, more structured features)
Understanding insurance requirements
Duration matching
Insurance companies match assets to liabilities. An insurer writing 20-year annuities needs 20-year assets. An insurer writing 5-year structured settlements needs 5-year assets.
What this means for you:
| Your Asset Duration | Insurance Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 0-2 years | Poor | Too short to match most insurance liabilities |
| 2-5 years | Moderate | Fits some shorter liability profiles |
| 5-10 years | Excellent | Core insurance duration matching |
| 10-20 years | Excellent | Premium duration for certain insurers |
| 20+ years | Varies | Some insurers specifically seek ultra-long |
Asset classes that typically fit:
- Auto loans (4-6 year WAL)
- Equipment finance (4-7 year WAL)
- Residential mortgages (7-15 year WAL)
- Commercial mortgages (5-10 year WAL)
- Student loans (10-15 year WAL)
- Aircraft/rail leasing (7-15 year WAL)
Asset classes that don’t fit well:
- Credit cards (revolving, no defined term)
- BNPL/point-of-sale (3-12 month WAL)
- Merchant cash advances (30-90 day WAL)
- Trade receivables (30-90 day WAL)
NAIC designations and capital charges
Insurance companies hold regulatory capital against their investments based on NAIC (National Association of Insurance Commissioners) designations. These ratings drive investment appetite.
NAIC designation overview:
| NAIC | Equivalent Rating | RBC Factor | Insurance Appetite |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAA to A- | 0.4% | Strong |
| 2 | BBB+ to BBB- | 1.3% | Strong |
| 3 | BB+ to BB- | 4.6% | Limited |
| 4 | B+ to B- | 10.0% | Minimal |
| 5 | CCC+ and below | 23.0% | Very limited |
| 6 | In default | 30.0% | None |
The RBC (Risk-Based Capital) factor determines how much capital the insurer must hold. A $100M investment with NAIC 1 designation requires $400K of capital. The same investment at NAIC 3 requires $4.6M of capital.
What this means for you:
- Insurance capital requires structures that achieve NAIC 1 or 2 (investment grade)
- Your underlying portfolio can be non-investment-grade, but the structure must create investment-grade tranches
- Subordination, overcollateralization, and excess spread are tools to achieve the ratings
- Insurance companies will not invest in positions below NAIC 2 in meaningful size
The SVO process
The Securities Valuation Office (SVO) is the NAIC body that assigns designations to insurance company investments. For private transactions (like ABF facilities), the SVO reviews and assigns a designation.
How SVO designation works:
- The structure is presented to the SVO with supporting documentation
- SVO analysts review credit quality, structure, and projected performance
- SVO assigns an NAIC designation (or declines to provide one)
- Insurance investors can then hold the position at that designation
SVO considerations for originators:
- Structures must be designed with SVO acceptance in mind
- Counsel and rating agency input help navigate SVO requirements
- Certain structural features can create SVO filing challenges
- Allow 4-8 weeks for SVO review in your closing timeline
Structuring for insurance capital
What structures work
Insurance companies typically invest in rated notes, not in raw loan pools or warehouse facilities. The path to insurance capital runs through structured products.
Typical insurance-eligible structures:
-
Term ABS with rated tranches. Traditional ABS issuance with AAA/AA/A tranches sold to insurance investors. This is the most common path but requires $100M+ portfolio size.
-
Private placement notes. Structured notes issued privately with NAIC filing. Can be smaller scale ($25M-$50M) but requires insurance relationship.
-
Insurance wrapper/repack. An insurance company wraps your credit risk and issues notes backed by that guarantee. Requires insurance company partnership.
-
Fund vehicle investment. Some insurance asset managers invest through fund structures that then invest in ABF. Less direct but more accessible.
Working with rating agencies
Insurance capital typically requires rated structures. Engaging rating agencies is part of the process.
For term ABS: Engage KBRA, DBRS, Fitch, or Moody’s/S&P. Rating agency processes take 8-12 weeks and require extensive portfolio analysis.
For private placements: Some insurance companies use internal ratings. Others require agency ratings even for private transactions.
Rating agency expectations:
- Static pool data showing loss emergence by vintage
- Modeling of cash flows under various stress scenarios
- Legal opinions on true sale and bankruptcy remoteness
- Servicer operational reviews
- Ongoing surveillance commitments
Building insurance relationships
The long game
Insurance capital takes longer to access than bank or fund capital. The first relationship may take 12-18 months to close. But once established, insurance relationships are stable and growing.
Relationship development timeline:
Months 1-3: Introduction and initial screening
- Secure introduction through shared relationships
- Provide overview of your platform and portfolio
- Initial credit team engagement
Months 4-8: Education and analysis
- Detailed portfolio review and analysis
- Management meetings (often multiple rounds)
- Structural discussions and term exploration
Months 9-12: Credit process and approval
- Formal credit committee submission
- Internal investment approval
- Term sheet negotiation
Months 13-18: Documentation and closing
- Definitive documentation
- SVO/regulatory approvals
- Closing and funding
Maintaining relationships
Once you have insurance capital, maintaining the relationship is relatively straightforward.
Ongoing requirements:
- Quarterly portfolio reports and performance updates
- Annual review meetings with investment team
- Prompt notification of material events
- Clean compliance with structural requirements
Growing the relationship:
- Insurance investors often increase allocations to performing platforms
- New products or asset classes can be introduced to existing partners
- Referrals to other insurance companies through the asset manager network
When insurance says no
Insurance companies decline opportunities for several reasons:
Duration mismatch. If your assets don’t match their liability profiles, they can’t invest regardless of credit quality.
Credit concerns. If the underlying collateral or your platform doesn’t meet their credit standards, they’ll decline.
Structural issues. NAIC designation concerns, documentation issues, or structural features that don’t fit their requirements.
Capacity. Insurance companies have allocation limits per issuer, asset class, and rating. They may like your deal but lack capacity.
What to do:
- Ask for specific feedback on why they declined
- Determine if issues are fixable or fundamental
- Consider if a different structure would fit their requirements
- Maintain the relationship for future opportunities
Timeline expectations
Insurance capital has the longest timeline of any capital provider type.
| Phase | Duration | Key Activities |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship initiation | 1-3 months | Introductions, initial meetings, platform overview |
| Due diligence | 3-6 months | Portfolio analysis, management meetings, operational review |
| Credit approval | 2-4 months | Internal committee process, term negotiation |
| Documentation | 3-6 months | Legal drafting, SVO filing, closing conditions |
| Total | 9-18 months | From first meeting to first funding |
Why it takes so long:
- Insurance credit processes are conservative and thorough
- Regulatory considerations (SVO, state insurance departments) add time
- Documentation is extensive and heavily negotiated
- Multiple internal stakeholders must approve
How to manage the timeline:
- Start insurance conversations 18-24 months before you need capital
- Have alternative capital (bank or fund) during the relationship-building period
- Use placement agents with insurance relationships to accelerate introductions
- Be patient; insurance relationships compound over time
Cross-references
- Sourcing capital overview for the full provider landscape
- NAIC filing and SVO process for regulatory details
- Approaching banks for faster-access alternatives
- Raising capital (allocator perspective) for the investor side of insurance capital