Documentation
Due diligence question bank
Due diligence question bank
This is your working checklist for ABF due diligence. Whether you’re a capital provider preparing questions or an originator anticipating them, use this as your starting point and customize by asset class and deal specifics.
The questions are organized into five categories: asset, originator, structure/legal, operations, and sample file review. Each question is tagged by priority level so you know what to focus on when time is limited.
How to use this question bank
For capital providers
Start here, but don’t stop here. This question bank covers the core areas, but every deal has specific risks that require tailored questions. Use this as scaffolding.
Workflow:
- Filter questions by priority (start with Critical, then Important)
- Customize for asset class (consumer unsecured differs from equipment finance)
- Document answers in a standardized diligence memo
- Flag items requiring follow-up or third-party verification
- Score each category and identify deal-breakers early
Timing matters. Ask the hard questions at term sheet stage, not two weeks before close. Capital providers who wait until documentation to surface issues lose leverage and waste time.
For originators
If you can’t answer these questions clearly, you’re not ready for institutional capital. Review this list before launching any capital raise.
Preparation checklist:
- Assign ownership for each category (who can answer what)
- Prepare supporting documentation in advance
- Build a data room that anticipates these questions
- Identify gaps and have a plan to address them
- Rehearse answers with your team before lender meetings
Priority levels
| Priority | Meaning | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Must be answered satisfactorily | Deal stops if unresolved |
| Important | Material to terms and structure | May affect pricing or structure |
| Standard | Good practice | Unlikely to kill a deal |
Asset-level diligence questions
These questions focus on the collateral itself: what are you buying, how does it perform, and can you trust the data?
Portfolio composition
Understanding what’s in the pool is foundational. You need to know the size, shape, and concentration of the portfolio before anything else.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| A-01 | What is the total outstanding balance and loan count? | Critical | Get both current and historical (last 12 months) |
| A-02 | What is the weighted average coupon (WAC)? | Critical | Compare to originator’s stated rates |
| A-03 | What is the weighted average remaining term (WARM)? | Critical | Impacts duration and cash flow timing |
| A-04 | What is the weighted average seasoning? | Important | Older loans are more predictable |
| A-05 | What is the distribution by loan size? | Important | Look for unusual concentrations |
| A-06 | What is the geographic distribution? | Important | State concentration affects regulatory risk |
| A-07 | What is the vintage distribution? | Critical | Never rely on blended performance across vintages |
| A-08 | What is the credit tier distribution (prime, near-prime, subprime)? | Critical | Must match stated credit box |
| A-09 | What are the concentration limits (largest obligor, state, employer)? | Important | Single-name risk can kill a pool |
| A-10 | How does the proposed pool compare to the originator’s total portfolio? | Important | Watch for adverse selection |
Note: Request vintage-level stratifications for all key metrics. Blended statistics hide the trend. A 5% loss rate could be 3% on 2023 vintage and 8% on 2024 vintage.
Credit performance
Performance history is the best predictor of future losses. Get granular data and compare to benchmarks.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| A-11 | What are the historical delinquency rates by bucket (30, 60, 90+ DPD)? | Critical | By vintage, not blended |
| A-12 | What is the cumulative net loss rate by vintage? | Critical | Request loss curves |
| A-13 | What is the recovery rate on charged-off loans? | Important | Affects loss severity |
| A-14 | How do loss curves compare to third-party data (Kroll, S&P, peer benchmarks)? | Important | If no benchmark exists, dig deeper |
| A-15 | What is the prepayment rate and its drivers? | Important | Impacts yield and duration |
| A-16 | What is the modification rate and how are modified loans performing? | Important | High mod rates may mask delinquency |
| A-17 | What are the roll rates by delinquency bucket? | Critical | Predicts future charge-offs |
| A-18 | How did the portfolio perform during COVID or other stress periods? | Important | Reveals stress resilience |
| A-19 | What is the distribution of loss by reason (default, fraud, skip)? | Important | High fraud losses are a red flag |
| A-20 | Are there any cohorts with anomalous performance (better or worse)? | Standard | If yes, understand why |
Worked Example: Loss Curve Analysis
You’re evaluating a consumer lender with the following vintage data:
| Vintage | UPB at Origination | Cumulative NCL at 12mo | Cumulative NCL at 24mo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2023 | $50M | 2.1% | 4.8% |
| Q2 2023 | $65M | 2.4% | 5.5% |
| Q3 2023 | $80M | 3.2% | 7.1% |
| Q4 2023 | $95M | 3.8% | (not yet mature) |
| Q1 2024 | $110M | 4.5% | (not yet mature) |
What this tells you: losses are increasing with each vintage as the originator scaled. The Q1 2024 vintage is tracking 50% worse than Q1 2023 at the same point in its life. This is a credit deterioration story, not a seasonal effect. Your follow-up questions should focus on what changed in underwriting or sourcing.
Underwriting and origination
How loans get made determines how they perform. Understand the process, the standards, and the exceptions.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| A-21 | What is the credit box (FICO range, DTI limits, income requirements)? | Critical | Get the current policy document |
| A-22 | How has the credit box evolved over the last 24 months? | Critical | Tightening or loosening? |
| A-23 | What is the exception rate (loans approved outside credit box)? | Critical | >5% is a yellow flag, >10% is a red flag |
| A-24 | Who can approve exceptions and what is the approval process? | Important | Watch for single-person override authority |
| A-25 | What verification is performed (income, employment, identity)? | Critical | Varies dramatically by asset class |
| A-26 | Is income verification performed on all loans or only above a threshold? | Critical | No-doc loans perform worse |
| A-27 | What is the fraud detection process at origination? | Important | Include vendor names and fraud rates |
| A-28 | What is the rejection rate and what are the primary reasons? | Standard | Low rejection rates suggest loose standards |
| A-29 | What is the loan-to-value or advance rate distribution? | Critical | For secured assets only |
| A-30 | Are there any channel-specific differences in underwriting (direct vs. broker vs. partner)? | Important | Partner channels often have higher risk |
Important: An originator who can’t produce their credit policy document in 24 hours is either disorganized or hiding something. Either way, that’s a problem.
Loan-level data quality
Data quality determines whether you can monitor the portfolio and enforce your triggers. Bad data kills deals.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| A-31 | Can a full loan-level tape be produced within 48 hours? | Critical | Test this during diligence |
| A-32 | What fields are available on the tape? | Critical | Compare to your minimum requirements |
| A-33 | Is there a unique loan ID that ties across all systems? | Critical | Reconciliation depends on this |
| A-34 | How are data corrections handled when errors are found? | Important | Look for audit trail |
| A-35 | Has a third-party data audit been performed? | Standard | If yes, request the report |
| A-36 | What is the data error rate by field (missing, invalid, out of range)? | Important | Critical fields should be >99% complete |
| A-37 | Can historical tapes be provided for trend analysis? | Important | Monthly snapshots for last 12+ months |
| A-38 | Is there loan-level performance history (payment by payment)? | Standard | Needed for detailed modeling |
| A-39 | How quickly can ad-hoc data requests be fulfilled? | Standard | Tests operational capability |
| A-40 | Are there any known data issues or reconciliation gaps? | Critical | Ask directly; some will disclose |
Originator-level diligence questions
You’re not just buying assets; you’re partnering with a company. Originator risk is often the dominant risk in ABF transactions.
Business and strategy
Understand the business model, competitive position, and growth trajectory. A business that can’t survive doesn’t produce quality assets.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| O-01 | What is the company history and how long has it been originating? | Critical | <3 years is early stage |
| O-02 | What is the origination volume by quarter for the last 12 quarters? | Critical | Look for growth rate and consistency |
| O-03 | What is the growth plan for the next 12-24 months? | Important | Is it realistic and funded? |
| O-04 | Who are the key competitors and how does the product differ? | Important | Sustainable differentiation matters |
| O-05 | What is the customer acquisition cost (CAC)? | Important | By channel if multiple |
| O-06 | What is the unit economics (revenue per loan, cost to originate, lifetime value)? | Critical | Must be profitable at scale |
| O-07 | What is the customer retention or repeat rate? | Standard | Indicates product-market fit |
| O-08 | What is the revenue breakdown (interest, fees, servicing)? | Important | Fee income volatility differs from interest income |
| O-09 | Is the originator dependent on any single channel or partner? | Critical | Partner concentration is a risk |
| O-10 | What is the technology stack and key vendor dependencies? | Standard | Vendor failure can disrupt operations |
Financial condition
An originator with weak financials is a counterparty risk. Understand their capital position and runway.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| O-11 | Can audited financials be provided for the last 2-3 years? | Critical | Unaudited is a red flag for >$20M originator |
| O-12 | What is the current cash runway without additional funding? | Critical | <6 months is a problem |
| O-13 | What is the capitalization structure (equity raised, existing debt)? | Critical | Get the full cap table |
| O-14 | What is the all-in cost of existing debt facilities? | Important | Your deal needs to fit the stack |
| O-15 | What is the profitability by vintage or channel? | Important | Aggregate profitability can mask problems |
| O-16 | What are the largest operating expenses and how do they scale? | Standard | Variable vs. fixed cost structure |
| O-17 | Are there any contingent liabilities or pending litigation? | Critical | Request disclosure schedule |
| O-18 | What is the servicing income on the existing portfolio? | Important | Servicing cash flow provides stability |
| O-19 | What is the intercompany debt or affiliate relationship structure? | Important | Watch for upstream cash extraction |
| O-20 | What is the minimum liquidity or tangible net worth covenant compliance? | Important | If existing covenants exist |
Worked Example: Cash Runway Analysis
An originator provides the following:
- Monthly cash burn: $800K
- Current cash on balance sheet: $3.2M
- Expected equity close: $5M in 60 days (not closed)
- Monthly origination: $12M
- Warehouse utilization: 85% of $50M facility
Your assessment: 4-month cash runway based on current cash, but dependent on an uncommitted equity raise. If the equity doesn’t close, they’ll need to slow originations to preserve cash. At 85% warehouse utilization, they’re also approaching capacity constraints. This originator has tight liquidity and execution risk on their equity raise.
Your follow-up: What happens to operations if the equity raise is delayed by 90 days?
Management and governance
People matter. Understand who runs the company and whether they can execute.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| O-21 | Who are the key executives and what is their background? | Critical | Request resumes and LinkedIn profiles |
| O-22 | How long has the current management team been in place? | Important | High turnover is a warning sign |
| O-23 | What is the board composition and governance structure? | Important | Independent directors matter |
| O-24 | What is the equity ownership structure? | Critical | Founder ownership affects incentives |
| O-25 | Is there key person risk and how is it mitigated? | Critical | Single-person dependency is real |
| O-26 | What is the employee turnover rate in critical functions (collections, underwriting, ops)? | Important | High turnover degrades performance |
| O-27 | What is the compensation structure for executives and originators? | Standard | Incentives drive behavior |
| O-28 | Are there any related-party transactions? | Important | Require disclosure |
| O-29 | What is the D&O insurance coverage? | Standard | Inadequate coverage is a governance failure |
| O-30 | Has any executive been involved in a bankruptcy, fraud investigation, or regulatory action? | Critical | Background checks are essential |
Regulatory and compliance
Regulatory risk can be existential. Understand the licensing, compliance infrastructure, and any pending matters.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| O-31 | What licenses does the originator hold and in what states? | Critical | Request full license list |
| O-32 | Is there a bank partnership and what are its terms? | Critical | Bank partner dependency is a concentration risk |
| O-33 | Has the company received any regulatory inquiries or enforcement actions? | Critical | Include state and federal |
| O-34 | What is the compliance infrastructure (compliance officer, audit function, training)? | Important | Named compliance officer required |
| O-35 | When was the last compliance audit and what were the findings? | Important | Request the report |
| O-36 | Are there any pending regulatory matters or expected changes? | Critical | Include CFPB, state AGs, licensing |
| O-37 | What is the process for ensuring ongoing licensing compliance? | Standard | Renewal tracking matters |
| O-38 | How are consumer complaints handled and tracked? | Important | CFPB complaint volume is public |
| O-39 | Is there a fair lending program and when was it last tested? | Important | Required for consumer lenders |
| O-40 | What is the UDAP/UDAAP compliance framework? | Important | Enforcement risk is high in this area |
Note: Search the NMLS Consumer Access database and state regulator websites for any enforcement actions. Originators don’t always disclose these voluntarily.
Structure and legal questions
These questions address how the deal is structured and the legal protections in place for capital providers.
Facility structure
Confirm your understanding of the proposed terms and identify any unusual provisions.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| S-01 | What is the proposed facility size and expected utilization? | Critical | Minimum utilization matters for economics |
| S-02 | What is the proposed advance rate by collateral type? | Critical | Compare to market benchmarks |
| S-03 | What is the proposed pricing (spread, SOFR floor, fees)? | Critical | All-in cost of capital |
| S-04 | What is the facility term and revolving period length? | Critical | Match to asset duration |
| S-05 | What is the ramp-up timeline and any minimum draw requirements? | Important | Affects yield during ramp |
| S-06 | What triggers and covenants are proposed? | Critical | Compare to your standard package |
| S-07 | Are there performance triggers (delinquency, loss, dilution)? | Critical | What are the trip levels and consequences? |
| S-08 | What is the cure mechanism for covenant breaches? | Important | Equity cure rights? |
| S-09 | Is there a borrowing base or asset coverage test? | Critical | Calculation methodology matters |
| S-10 | What is the amortization period length after revolving period ends? | Important | Affects terminal risk |
SPV and bankruptcy remoteness
The SPV structure is your bankruptcy protection. Verify it’s properly established and maintained.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| S-11 | Is a new SPV required or can an existing entity be used? | Important | Existing SPVs have history to review |
| S-12 | What is the SPV jurisdiction and organizational structure? | Important | Delaware LLC is standard |
| S-13 | Who are the members/owners of the SPV? | Critical | Ownership structure affects consolidation risk |
| S-14 | Are there any substantive consolidation risks? | Critical | Get legal analysis |
| S-15 | Who are the independent directors/managers and what are their qualifications? | Important | Professional independents preferred |
| S-16 | Are separateness covenants in place? | Critical | Standard provisions for BR remoteness |
| S-17 | Is a true sale opinion required and who provides it? | Important | Law firm reputation matters |
| S-18 | Is a bankruptcy remoteness opinion required? | Critical | Standard for rated deals |
| S-19 | What are the SPV’s organizational documents and when were they last updated? | Standard | Request copies |
| S-20 | Are there any other claims on the SPV (other facilities, intercompany loans)? | Critical | SPV should be clean |
Security and perfection
If things go wrong, your security interest is what protects you. Verify perfection and priority.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| S-21 | What collateral is being pledged? | Critical | Receivables, bank accounts, other assets |
| S-22 | How will security interests be perfected (UCC, account control agreements)? | Critical | Perfection method by collateral type |
| S-23 | Are there any prior liens or competing security interests? | Critical | UCC searches required |
| S-24 | What is the chain of title from origination to SPV? | Critical | Assignment documentation |
| S-25 | Is the collateral agent satisfactory? | Important | Reputation and capability |
| S-26 | Are control agreements in place for all deposit accounts? | Critical | Blocking notice capability |
| S-27 | Is there physical collateral and how is possession managed? | Important | For equipment, auto, titled assets |
| S-28 | Are there any obligor notification requirements for true sale? | Important | Depends on jurisdiction |
| S-29 | What is the process for releasing collateral upon payoff? | Standard | Operational procedure |
| S-30 | Is there a backup servicer requirement? | Important | Successor servicing protection |
Legal documentation
Understand the document structure and negotiation process.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| S-31 | What documents will be required (credit agreement, security agreement, servicing agreement, etc.)? | Critical | Full document list |
| S-32 | Who is drafting and who is reviewing? | Standard | Outside counsel for both sides |
| S-33 | What is the expected timeline from term sheet to close? | Important | Realistic expectation setting |
| S-34 | Are there any unusual or non-standard provisions proposed? | Important | Flag early |
| S-35 | What reps and warranties will be required at asset and originator level? | Critical | Breadth and survival period |
| S-36 | What are the rep breach remedies (repurchase, indemnity, facility termination)? | Critical | Enforcement mechanism |
| S-37 | What ongoing reporting covenants will be required? | Important | Monthly, quarterly, annual |
| S-38 | What are the events of default and grace periods? | Critical | Standard vs. non-standard |
| S-39 | What are the remedies upon default? | Critical | Acceleration, enforcement rights |
| S-40 | Is there a rating agency requirement (shadow rating, public rating)? | Important | Adds timeline and cost |
Operational and servicing questions
Operations determine whether assets perform as expected. Poor servicing turns good collateral into bad collateral.
Servicing capabilities
Understand how the portfolio is serviced day-to-day.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| P-01 | Is servicing in-house or outsourced? | Critical | If outsourced, who and what terms |
| P-02 | What is the servicing platform and how long has it been in use? | Critical | Platform stability matters |
| P-03 | What is the staffing level relative to portfolio size? | Important | Accounts per collector, etc. |
| P-04 | What is the servicing fee structure? | Important | Embedded in yield or explicit |
| P-05 | What is the delinquency management process? | Critical | Contact strategy and timing |
| P-06 | How are modifications and hardship programs handled? | Important | Modification authority and limits |
| P-07 | What is the escalation process for seriously delinquent accounts? | Important | At what point does strategy change |
| P-08 | Is there a quality assurance program for servicing? | Standard | Call monitoring, file reviews |
| P-09 | What servicing audits have been performed (SSAE 18, regulatory, etc.)? | Important | Request reports |
| P-10 | What is the capacity for growth (can servicing scale with origination)? | Important | Scaling plan |
Collections and recovery
When loans go bad, collections and recovery determine your actual loss.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| P-11 | What is the collections strategy (in-house, agency, legal)? | Critical | By delinquency stage |
| P-12 | What are the recovery rates by delinquency bucket? | Critical | 30, 60, 90+, charge-off |
| P-13 | How are charge-off decisions made and what is the timeline? | Important | Policy vs. practice |
| P-14 | What agencies are used for third-party collections? | Standard | Names and contingency rates |
| P-15 | Is there a deficiency collection program? | Standard | Post charge-off recovery |
| P-16 | What is the fraud detection and response process post-origination? | Important | Early fraud detection matters |
| P-17 | What is the litigation strategy for delinquent accounts? | Standard | Threshold for legal action |
| P-18 | For secured assets, what is the repossession/foreclosure process? | Critical | Timeline and cost |
| P-19 | What is the asset disposition process (remarketing, auction, wholesale)? | Important | For secured assets |
| P-20 | How are recovery proceeds allocated between parties? | Important | Sharing agreements |
Worked Example: Recovery Rate Analysis
You receive the following recovery data from a consumer lender:
| Charge-off Vintage | Gross Charge-offs | Recoveries to Date | Recovery Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2023 | $2.1M | $0.41M | 19.5% |
| Q2 2023 | $2.8M | $0.50M | 17.9% |
| Q3 2023 | $3.5M | $0.45M | 12.9% |
| Q4 2023 | $4.2M | $0.38M | 9.0% |
Illustrative pricing. See pricing disclaimer.
What this tells you: recovery rates are declining as charge-off volume increases. This could indicate (a) collection capacity constraints, (b) changing mix of charge-off reasons, or (c) reduced collection effort as the team is overwhelmed. Your follow-up should ask about collection staffing changes and reason code distribution.
Reporting and technology
Can the originator produce accurate reports on time? This determines your ability to monitor the facility.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| P-21 | What monthly reports are produced and what is the timeline? | Critical | Days after month-end |
| P-22 | Can loan-level data be delivered in standard formats (CSV, Excel, XML)? | Critical | Compatibility with your systems |
| P-23 | Is there API access to servicing system data? | Standard | For real-time monitoring |
| P-24 | What is the disaster recovery and business continuity plan? | Important | RTO and RPO targets |
| P-25 | When was the last DR test performed? | Standard | Test results available |
| P-26 | How is data security maintained (encryption, access controls)? | Important | SOC 2 or equivalent |
| P-27 | What is the change management process for servicing system updates? | Standard | Testing and rollback procedures |
| P-28 | Are there any known system limitations or workarounds? | Important | Excel as shadow system is a red flag |
| P-29 | What is the reconciliation process between servicing and accounting systems? | Important | Daily, weekly, monthly |
| P-30 | Can borrowing base calculations be independently verified? | Critical | Audit rights |
Backup servicing
If the originator fails, backup servicing keeps the portfolio performing.
| # | Question | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| P-31 | Is a backup servicer in place or required? | Critical | Hot, warm, or cold backup |
| P-32 | Who is the backup servicer and what is their experience? | Important | Prior transfers in this asset class |
| P-33 | What is the backup servicer’s access to systems and data? | Important | Real-time vs. periodic |
| P-34 | What is the estimated transition timeline if backup is activated? | Critical | 30, 60, 90 days |
| P-35 | Has a servicing transition drill been conducted? | Standard | When and results |
| P-36 | What are the backup servicer fees (standby and active)? | Important | Passed through or absorbed |
| P-37 | What are the termination triggers for the primary servicer? | Critical | Performance, financial, operational |
| P-38 | Who has authority to activate the backup servicer? | Critical | Capital provider or trustee |
| P-39 | What is the backup servicer’s capacity to take on this portfolio? | Important | Bandwidth constraints |
| P-40 | Is there a servicing transfer agreement in place? | Critical | Documented process |
Sample file review protocol
Summary statistics can mask underlying problems. Always pull files. A 50-100 loan sample review is standard practice and non-negotiable.
Sample selection
Design your sample to stress-test the data, not confirm it.
Selection criteria:
- Random selection (not cherry-picked by the originator)
- Stratified by vintage (include each of the last 8-12 quarters)
- Include credit tier distribution matching the pool
- Geographic representation
- Include performing and delinquent loans
- Include any modified loans
- Include exception loans (outside credit box)
Sample size by portfolio:
| Portfolio Size | Minimum Sample |
|---|---|
| <500 loans | 30 loans |
| 500-2,000 loans | 50 loans |
| 2,000-10,000 loans | 75 loans |
| >10,000 loans | 100 loans |
Document checklist (per loan)
Every file should contain the following (adjust by asset class):
| Document | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Signed loan agreement/promissory note | Yes | Wet or e-signature |
| Identity verification (KYC documentation) | Yes | ID copies, SSN verification |
| Income verification | If applicable | Pay stubs, tax returns, bank statements |
| Employment verification | If applicable | Verbal VOE or documentation |
| Credit report at origination | Yes | Score and tradelines |
| Underwriting notes or decision rationale | Yes | Automated decision or manual |
| Payment history | Yes | Should match tape |
| Modification documentation | If applicable | Agreement and approval |
| Collateral documentation | If secured | Title, UCC, etc. |
Review criteria
For each file, evaluate:
| Criterion | What You’re Checking |
|---|---|
| Data accuracy | Does documentation match data tape fields? |
| Underwriting compliance | Were guidelines followed? Was exception approved? |
| Completeness | Are all required documents present? |
| Signature validity | Proper execution and dating? |
| Chain of custody | Clear assignment trail? |
| Regulatory compliance | Required disclosures included? |
Scoring and findings
Per-loan scoring:
- Pass: File complete, no issues
- Minor exception: Small documentation gap, no credit concern
- Major exception: Material underwriting deviation or missing critical documentation
- Fail: Documentation insufficient to enforce the loan
Aggregate thresholds:
| Finding Rate | Assessment |
|---|---|
| <5% major exceptions | Acceptable |
| 5-10% major exceptions | Concerns, may require rep breach remedies |
| >10% major exceptions | Serious concerns, may be deal-breaker |
| >15% major exceptions | Walk away |
Illustrative pricing. See pricing disclaimer.
Sample file review memo format
Document findings in a standardized format:
SAMPLE FILE REVIEW FINDINGS
Pool: [Pool Name/Cutoff Date]
Sample Size: [X] loans
Review Date: [Date]
Reviewer: [Name]
SUMMARY
- Total files reviewed: X
- Pass: X (X%)
- Minor exceptions: X (X%)
- Major exceptions: X (X%)
- Fails: X (X%)
FINDINGS BY CATEGORY
1. Documentation gaps: X findings
- Missing income verification: X loans
- Missing signed agreement: X loans
- [etc.]
2. Underwriting exceptions: X findings
- FICO below policy minimum: X loans
- DTI above policy maximum: X loans
- [etc.]
3. Data mismatches: X findings
- Loan amount discrepancy: X loans
- Rate discrepancy: X loans
- [etc.]
RECOMMENDATION
[ ] Proceed
[ ] Proceed with conditions (specify)
[ ] Do not proceed
CONDITIONS (if applicable):
1. [Condition]
2. [Condition]
Important: Sample file review is not optional. If an originator pushes back on file review, that’s a major red flag. The question is: what are they hiding? Sophisticated capital providers always pull files.
Cross-references
- Your Loan Tape: What Lenders Actually Look At — how this question bank fits into the overall process
- Term Sheet Anatomy — questions that should be answered before signing
- Deal Autopsy — what happens when diligence is inadequate
- Term Sheet Anatomy — deeper dive on how servicing standards appear in transaction documents
- ABF Glossary — terminology definitions
Appendix: question export
Use this simplified checklist format for working sessions. Copy and customize for your deal.
Critical questions checklist
Asset:
- A-01: Outstanding balance and loan count
- A-02: Weighted average coupon
- A-03: Weighted average remaining term
- A-07: Vintage distribution
- A-08: Credit tier distribution
- A-11: Delinquency rates by bucket (by vintage)
- A-12: Cumulative net loss rate by vintage
- A-17: Roll rates
- A-21: Credit box documentation
- A-22: Credit box evolution
- A-23: Exception rate
- A-25: Verification performed
- A-26: Income verification policy
- A-31: Loan tape delivery capability
- A-32: Available data fields
- A-33: Unique loan ID
Originator:
- O-01: Company history
- O-02: Origination volume trend
- O-06: Unit economics
- O-09: Channel/partner concentration
- O-11: Audited financials
- O-12: Cash runway
- O-13: Cap table
- O-17: Contingent liabilities
- O-21: Executive backgrounds
- O-25: Key person risk
- O-30: Background checks
- O-31: Licenses
- O-32: Bank partnership
- O-33: Regulatory history
- O-36: Pending regulatory matters
Structure:
- S-01: Facility size and utilization
- S-02: Advance rate
- S-03: Pricing
- S-04: Term
- S-06: Triggers and covenants
- S-07: Performance triggers
- S-09: Borrowing base
- S-13: SPV ownership
- S-14: Consolidation risk
- S-16: Separateness covenants
- S-18: BR remoteness opinion
- S-20: Other SPV claims
- S-21: Collateral
- S-22: Perfection
- S-23: Prior liens
- S-24: Chain of title
- S-26: Control agreements
- S-31: Document list
- S-35: Reps and warranties
- S-36: Rep breach remedies
- S-38: Events of default
- S-39: Remedies
Operations:
- P-01: Servicing arrangement
- P-02: Servicing platform
- P-05: Delinquency management
- P-11: Collections strategy
- P-12: Recovery rates
- P-21: Monthly reports
- P-22: Data delivery format
- P-30: Borrowing base verification
- P-31: Backup servicer
- P-34: Transition timeline
- P-37: Servicer termination triggers
- P-38: Backup activation authority
- P-40: Transfer agreement